How Cutting Down Tropical Forests is Costing Lives Through Deadly Heat

Animated map showing heat-related mortality rates linked to deforestation across Tropical Central and South America, with darker colors representing higher deaths per 100,000 people.
The maps show regions of Tropical Central and South America (a), Tropical Africa (b), and Southeast Asia (c). Colours show number of deaths per year per 100,000 people located in areas of forest loss (central estimate), aggregated by second-level administration divisions. Boundaries for second-level administration divisions are from GADM (https://gadm.org/index.html).

When we hear about deforestation, many of us think first about disappearing wildlife, endangered species, or the loss of carbon storage that slows climate change. All of that is true, but there’s another hidden danger. Cutting down tropical forests hurts our planet’s biodiversity and directly affects human health. New research shows that losing forests makes people hotter, sicker, and in many cases, more likely to die from extreme heat.

What the Study Found

A recent study published in Nature Climate Change looked at forest loss across the tropics between 2001 and 2020. The researchers found that when forests are cleared, the land surface warms up quickly. On average, deforested areas became almost 0.5 °C hotter than places that kept their trees.

That may not sound like much, but for people living in already hot, humid places, even small increases can push temperatures past safe limits. The study estimated that about 345 million people have been exposed to this extra warming caused by deforestation. That’s nearly the size of the entire U.S. population.

The Human Toll

The warming from deforestation is deadly. According to the study, deforestation is linked to about 28,000 extra heat-related deaths each year (Reddington et al., 2025). These deaths happen because the body can only handle so much heat before heart, lung, or kidney problems set in.

Some of the hardest-hit regions include:

  • Indonesia, Vietnam, and Malaysia, where heat deaths per 100,000 people are among the highest in the world.

  • Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of Congo, which also face significant impacts.

  • Southeast Asia overall, which accounts for more than half of all the deaths linked to deforestation-related heat.

In these countries, outdoor workers, such as farmers and construction workers, are especially vulnerable.

Why the Tropics Are Vulnerable

The tropics, regions close to the equator, are home to over 3.5 billion people. Many of these communities depend on outdoor work for their livelihoods. When forests are cut, not only does the land heat up, but shade disappears too. That makes outdoor work far more dangerous.

Health care access also plays a big role. In many tropical nations, hospitals and clinics are already under pressure, and people may not have reliable access to air conditioning, cooling centers, or emergency care. This limited ability to adapt means heat has a bigger impact on vulnerable groups, such as children, older adults, and outdoor workers.

Other Hidden Dangers

Heat isn’t the only risk linked to cutting forests. Deforestation also leads to:

  • Air pollution from fires: When forests are burned, smoke can spread across entire regions. In past years, haze from Indonesian forest fires exposed tens of millions of people to unsafe air, leading to thousands of premature deaths.

  • Spread of diseases: Clearing forests can increase the spread of diseases like malaria. In some places, standing water left after logging creates ideal breeding grounds for mosquitoes.

Together, these risks make deforestation not only an environmental problem but also a serious public health issue.

What Can Be Done

The good news is that protecting forests can prevent many of these heat-related deaths. Keeping trees standing provides shade, keeps local areas cooler, and reduces harmful smoke. On a larger scale, forests act as a buffer against climate change by storing carbon and releasing moisture into the air.

Steps that can help include:

  • Stronger protections for tropical forests through laws and enforcement.

  • Community-led conservation that involves local and Indigenous groups who know the land best.

  • Investment in health systems and cooling strategies to protect people who already live in areas affected by deforestation.

  • Global cooperation to reduce demand for products linked to deforestation, such as unsustainable palm oil, soy, and beef.

These actions can save thousands of lives each year.

Summing Up

The study’s message is clear: tropical forests aren’t just “carbon sinks” or wildlife havens. They are lifelines for millions of people. Losing them raises local temperatures, increases the risk of deadly heat, and harms human health in ways many of us never considered.

By protecting tropical forests, we preserve ecosystems while protecting people. Safeguarding these forests is a direct investment in healthier, safer communities around the world.


Source: Reddington, C. L., Smith, C., Butt, E. W., Baker, J. C. A., Oliveira, B. F. A., Yamba, E. I., & Spracklen, D. V. (2025). Tropical deforestation is associated with considerable heat-related mortality. Nature Climate Change. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02411-0

Why the Great Barrier Reef’s Alarming Coral Loss Matters to All of Us

Cover of the CCDH report titled “Healthy coral reef with diverse marine life under clear tropical waters, sunlight streaming through the surface.
A vibrant coral reef teeming with marine life, a reminder of what’s at stake in the fight against climate change.

The Great Barrier Reef is a living system that protects coastlines, supports marine life, sustains fisheries, and drives tourism economies. It’s also part of the cultural heritage of Australia’s First Nations peoples, who have cared for these waters for tens of thousands of years.

And right now, it’s under serious pressure.

The latest report from the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) delivers the clearest picture yet of what’s happening beneath the surface and the numbers are sobering. After the most widespread and severe coral bleaching event ever recorded on the Reef, coral cover has dropped sharply across all three major regions.

What the Scientists Found

Between August 2024 and May 2025, AIMS scientists surveyed 124 reefs. They found:

  • Largest annual coral loss in nearly 40 years of monitoring.

  • Declines in coral cover of 14% to 30% regionally, with some reefs losing up to 70.8% of their coral.

  • Nearly half of reefs (48%) saw declines; only 10% improved.

Bleaching wasn’t the only culprit. Cyclones, flood plumes, and outbreaks of the coral-eating crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster cf. solaris) compounded the damage. But bleaching caused by marine heatwaves was by far the biggest driver.

The 2024 Bleaching Event: A Breaking Point

The 2024 bleaching was the fifth mass bleaching event on the Reef since 2016 and part of a global wave of bleaching that began in 2023. It was unprecedented in scale:

  • High to extreme bleaching was recorded on 49% of surveyed reefs.

  • Some areas in the Southern GBR experienced degree heating weeks (DHW) above 15—nearly double the threshold at which corals begin dying en masse.

  • Fast-growing Acropora corals, which help reefs recover quickly after damage, were among the hardest hit.

In plain terms: The heat didn’t just stress the Reef—it killed large sections outright.

How the Regions Fared

  • Northern GBR: Coral cover fell from 39.8% to 30% — a 24.8% drop, the largest annual decline on record for the region. Losses were worst around Lizard Island.

  • Central GBR: Dropped from 33.2% to 28.6% (–13.9%), with bleaching and flood plumes north of Cairns doing the most damage.

  • Southern GBR: Fell from 38.9% to 26.9% (–30.6%), the steepest annual drop ever recorded there. Many reefs saw more than half their coral vanish in a single year.

Why This Matters to All of Us

Coral reefs are the foundation of marine biodiversity. Without them coastal communities lose protection from storms and erosion. Fisheries decline, threatening food supplies and livelihoods. Tourism industries falter, hitting economies hard. Cultural heritage suffers, particularly for Traditional Owners whose histories and traditions are tied to these waters. And globally, reefs act as early warning systems. What happens here is a signal of what’s coming elsewhere.

Recovery Is Possible, But the Window Is Shrinking

Historically, reefs could bounce back from damage over a decade or more. Now, mass bleaching events are hitting roughly every two years. That’s not enough time for full recovery.

Still, there’s hope. The GBR remains one of the healthier large reef systems on Earth, and local interventions are making a difference:

  • Crown-of-thorns starfish control programs are slowing outbreaks.

  • Water quality improvements are reducing local stress.

  • Coral restoration projects are helping reseed damaged areas.

But without global action to curb greenhouse gas emissions, these efforts can only buy time.

The Bottom Line

The 2024–2025 coral loss is a signal that climate impacts are accelerating and hitting ecosystems faster than they can adapt. Protecting the Reef is not optional. It’s about safeguarding biodiversity, food security, culture, and the natural defenses that protect millions of people.

We still have a choice. Every fraction of a degree of avoided warming, every reef protected from starfish outbreaks, every local stress reduced—it all matters. The Reef’s survival depends on what we do next.


Source: Australian Institute of Marine Science. (2025). Long-term monitoring program: Annual summary report of coral reef condition 2024–25. Australian Institute of Marine Science.

When Disaster Strikes, So Do the Lies: How Misinformation Makes Weather Emergencies Worse

Cover of the CCDH report titled “Extreme Weather,” featuring images of a wildfire, hurricane, flood response team, and destroyed homes, with a subtitle warning about the spread of false climate information on social media.
Cover of Extreme Weather, a 2025 report from the Center for Countering Digital Hate, examining how social media platforms allow climate misinformation to spread during natural disasters — putting lives at risk. Source: Center for Countering Digital Hate, 2025

When deadly floods swept through Texas during the July 4th weekend of 2025, families searched for help and answers. But instead of facts, many found dangerous lies online — like claims that the government had used “weather weapons” to cause the disaster.

It sounds far-fetched, but these ideas aren’t just fringe conspiracy theories anymore. They’re reaching millions of people, right when those people need trustworthy information the most. In moments when accurate updates can save lives, false claims on social media can confuse, scare, and even cause harm — and that’s exactly what’s happening on platforms like X, YouTube, and Facebook.

What’s Happening?

A new report from the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) found that false claims about disasters like floods, wildfires, and hurricanes are spreading quickly across social media. The researchers reviewed 300 of the most-liked misleading posts from April 2023 to April 2025.

Here’s what they discovered:

  • These posts gained over 221 million views.

  • Nearly all went unlabeled and unchallenged — no fact-checks, no warnings, no corrections.

  • Some of the most extreme lies — like the idea that natural disasters were caused by “weather weapons” — were given huge platforms, even after real tragedies.

One of the most troubling examples came from conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who claimed the Texas floods were caused by government interference. His posts weren’t hidden or flagged. They were amplified.

Who’s Behind It?

It turns out that many of these misleading posts came from verified users. On Twitter, that blue checkmark, once meant to help people spot reliable voices, is now, on X, being sold and used by those spreading misinformation.

  • 88% of the false posts on X came from verified users.
  • 73% on YouTube, and 64% on Meta (Facebook and Instagram).

One of the most high-profile figures in the study is Alex Jones, a far-right media personality and conspiracy theorist best known for his website InfoWars. Jones has promoted numerous false claims over the years — including that the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting was a hoax. For these and other violations of platform policies on hate speech, harassment, and misinformation, he was banned from Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Twitter between 2018 and 2020.

However, Jones returned to X (formerly Twitter) after the platform reinstated several previously banned accounts in 2023. During the LA wildfires in 2025, Jones used his X account to spread false claims that FEMA was confiscating food and that the fires were part of a “globalist plot.” His wildfire-related posts received over 408 million views — more than FEMA and 10 major news outlets combined during that period.

Even when banned users like Jones couldn’t post directly on some platforms, their false messages lived on. Others reposted their claims or created content that echoed their talking points. On YouTube, for example, 1 in 3 misleading videos led to more misleading videos through the “Up Next” panel.

Why It’s Dangerous

It’s easy to think, “People won’t believe that stuff.” But the truth is, misinformation can cause real harm — especially during emergencies.

  • Some victims avoid seeking aid, believing false claims that disaster relief is only given to certain groups.

  • First responders have been threatened after lies spread about their efforts.

  • A man in Oklahoma vandalized a weather radar system, thinking it was part of a weather-control conspiracy.

And the consequences don’t stop there. A cloud seeding company received over 100 death threats due to false claims linking it to the floods.

How Big Is the Problem?

The reach of misinformation is staggering.

  • Alex Jones’ posts about the LA wildfires alone received 408 million views on X. That’s more than FEMA and 10 major news outlets combined during the same period.

  • In the week following the Texas floods, false posts blaming cloud seeding or climate hoaxes racked up 8.4 million views — without a single fact-check.

These lies are spreading faster than the truth. That’s a big problem.

What Needs to Change

We need to expect more from social media platforms. Here’s what the CCDH report found:

  • Less than 2% of false posts were labeled or fact-checked.

  • Platforms are still profiting — through ads, subscriptions, and increased engagement — even when the content is dangerous.

That means the current system rewards outrage and falsehoods, not truth. And when disaster strikes, that business model puts people at risk.

What You Can Do

We don’t need to wait for platforms to act. Each of us has a role to play in slowing the spread of dangerous misinformation.

Here are a few simple actions we can take:

  • Follow trusted sources like FEMA, your local emergency services, and reliable news outlets.

  • Think before sharing: If something sounds too wild to be true, double-check it first.

  • Report harmful posts that spread misinformation during emergencies.

Collectively, taking these small steps helps us help our communities stay informed and safe.

Summing Up

The next hurricane, wildfire, or flood isn’t a matter of if — it’s when. And in those crucial hours, the difference between truth and lies could mean life or death.

That’s why it’s so important to demand better from platforms — and do our part to protect each other. Let’s make sure the next time disaster strikes, facts come first.


Source: Center for Countering Digital Hate. (2025). Extreme Weather: How social media platforms profit from climate denial and misinformation during disasters. https://counterhate.com/research/extreme-weather-false-claims/